The question before the panel:
Format February 21, 2008
Filed under: Wordpress — --Deb @ 1:18 am
All other things (like price and storage space) being equal, given a choice in a perfect world, would you rather have paperbacks in your library? Or hardcovers? And why?
I like a mix of both. All of the Harry Potters, for example, should be in hardback. But a book like Motley Crue's ouvre, The Dirt, is great to take to the beach or into the tub, so I'm glad I have that one in softback. I never gave it much thought, and can't really separate the cost issue from whether or not I'd want all hardbacks or soft covers. I tend to think that the ones I want to keep, like the Harry Potter books, should be all hardbacks, but the ones I bought just because Ir eally wanted to read them are good in softback.
For those who think "summer library hours" should be longer, not shorter.
Friday, February 22, 2008
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
1 comment:
I tend to prefer paperbacks, those that are slightly oversized (I think these are not mass market paperbacks and I'm sure that size has a name - I just don't know what it is). They're more comfortable to read.
At the same time, I have copies of most of My Most Favorite Books Ever in hardback (A Thousand Acres, New York Days, Midnight in the Garden of Good and Evil). Just because.
Post a Comment